http://atlah.org Recorded on 28 June 2012

“ATLAH: THAT’S WHAT GOD SAID.”
Anointed to establish families, churches and businesses, unlike any the world hath seen. Indeed the final product of the land, ATLAH, will boast of being the seat of the world’s banking, business, and education centers.

Love us or hate us?
Please Support Us

http://bit.ly/wP2lQ1

March 28, 2012

By Michael Master

www.saveamericanow.us.com

The Supreme Court hearings about Obamacare had many fascinating moments. It is trying to determine if mandatory purchase of insurance is “necessary and proper” as defined in the Constitution.

One moment that stands out to me is when Kagan asked if tax credits could be used to motivate people to buy healthcare insurance rather than having to mandate purchase of insurance.

Another one was when Scalia asked if there are other methods to provide healthcare to people who can not afford to pay for it. If there are other methods, then why is it “necessary and proper” for the government to force people to buy insurance?

And my favorite was when Kennedy asked if the penalty for not purchasing insurance is a tax or not a tax. The government argued that it was not a tax to get the legislation passed and is now arguing that it is a tax so the penalty is constitutional according to the 16th Amendment.

Tax credits (as in my book, Rules for Conservatives): Let’s say that the government allows you to deduct your out-of-pocket expenses to purchase health insurance up to $2,000 per dependent from your tax obligation if you provide the actual insurance receipts. Are you going to purchase insurance? Of course. You will at least purchase catastrophic insurance. As a young person under the age of 35, catastrophic insurance will probably cost less than $1500 per year.

Let’s assume that you pay no income taxes, so then the government will return to you what you paid out-of- pocket for insurance up to $2000 per dependent. A family of 4 could get an $8,000 rebate. Would you at least buy catastrophic insurance? Of course you would.

No government mandate would be needed to make people buy insurance. It would increase taxes some to cover these credits, but not anything close to the $2.4 trillion that is now projected as the cost for Obamacare for the next 10 years.

Other methods of providing healthcare: Does everyone need insurance in order to provide healthcare to those who cannot afford it? Of course not. SChips and other government programs assured healthcare providers that they would get paid. As Scalia said, Obamacare just shifts who is writing the check from the government to the insurance companies, but the tax payers are still paying for it.

Is the penalty for not purchasing insurance a tax? The Democrats argued that it is not a tax when they fought to get the legislation passed and now they argue that it is a tax to make it constitutional. So is it a tax or not? And if you pay the penalty, then you still don’t have insurance, so what is accomplished by the penalty? One thing that we know for sure from this is that this administration will say anything to get its way … depending on the audience. It cannot be trusted.

If there are other methods to pay for healthcare or to motivate people to purchase insurance, then how can the current government claim that mandating the purchase of insurance is the only way to provide healthcare … that it is “necessary and proper” to provide healthcare to Americans?

In my mind, they lied to us to get legislation passed to reward the insurance industry. How many Americans realize that insurance industry lobbyists wrote the actual Obamacare legislation?

As stated in an op ed written by me for World Net Daily two years ago, Insurance Companies are the winners with ObamaCare:

As the insurance companies complain about the healthcare insurance bill, Democrats have written a bill that benefits those insurance companies. It mandates that all Americans must purchase insurance so it provides more young profitable customers to the insurance companies. It allows the government to reduce benefits so the insurance companies make more profit. It regulates fees paid to hospitals and doctors so the government acts as the negotiator for the insurance cartel.

….. Congress is about to pass a bill of 2700 pages that will forever change the nature of healthcare in America without really understanding what is in the bill. And Obama is labeling opposition to ObamaCare as being against healthcare reform.

According to statistics maintained by the Center for Responsive Politics….

1. The top three Senate recipients for insurance industry contributions — all Democrats — are Sens. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Harry Reid, D-Nev., according to the center’s research. And in the House, it’s another trio of Democrats: Reps. Melissa Bean, D-Ill., Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D., and Barney Frank, D-Mass.

2. According to the Wall Street Journal of April 30, 2007, Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer received a combined total of $2.4 million from the insurance companies.

3. The Washington Post of July 21, 2009 states “Chairman Baucus (D-Mont.) has emerged as a leading recipient of Senate campaign contributions from the hospitals, insurers and other medical interest groups … Health-related companies and their employees gave Baucus’s political committees nearly $1.5 million in 2007 and 2008.”

4. The Center for Responsive Politics shows that President Obama received a staggering $20,175,303 from the healthcare industry during the 2008 election cycle, nearly three times the amount of his presidential rival John McCain.

Just like in the “Song of the South” when the rabbit says to the bear, “Don’t throw me in that briar patch,” the insurance companies are saying don’t pass this bill … but they really want it. Otherwise, why would these Democrats be pushing it when they get so much money from insurance companies?

If for some crazy reason, the Supreme Court finds that mandating the purchase of insurance is “necessary and proper” to provide healthcare to Americans, then we taxpaying Americans need to do everything “necessary and proper” to get it repealed so we can implement other alternatives.

Michael Master is the author of “Save America Now!” and “Rules for Conservatives” which can be ordered at www.saveamericanow.us.com

By Michael Master

www.saveamericanow.us.com

World Net Daily carried this story on April 2, 2012: Hollywood producer heard Bill Clinton say Obama ineligible.

Jerry Corsi interviewed Bettina Viviano, Hollywood producer, who said that she heard Bill Clinton say during the primary elections in 2008 that some thugs threatened to harm Chelsea Clinton if Hillary pursued the natural born citizenship of Barrack Hussein Obama.

What did the Clinton’s discover? How about this:

- that Obama was not born in the USA and his birth certificate is a forgery.

- that Obama attended college as a foreign student.

- that Obama listed himself as a foreigner on his passport.

- that the Social Security number used by Obama was stolen from a dead man to make Obama look like a natural born citizen.

Any one of those would have made Obama ineligible to be president. All of those possibilities still need to be answered. The Democrat controlled Congress of 2008 did not investigate any of those issues, so those questions still remain unanswered.

But as important as this issue about Obama’s citizenship is to America, it falls secondary to something else even more serious: Did a thug representing Obama threaten harm to Chelsea Clinton to stop Hillary from pursuing his citizenship?

Did you notice that Hillary and her campaign suddenly dropped all discussions about Obama’s citizenship? Why?

Let’s make two assumptions:

1. that bad people do bad things not visible to the rest of us until years after the fact.

2. that most Americans do not want to think that their elected officials are bad people even though so many politicians prove to be bad.

As discussed in my book, Rules for Conservatives, Saul Alinsky taught his followers that “the end justifies the means.” He ridiculed the moralists who condemned his philosophy and described them as “mean-and-end moralists who wind up on their ends without any means.”

As discussed by the Chicago Sun-Times, both Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama are products of Saul Alinsky. So if the Obama people did threaten to harm Chelsea Clinton, did Bill or Hillary treat it seriously? Of course they did … they know that Obama practices that “the end justifies the means” as a student of Alinsky because Hillary is also a student of Alinsky.

So how is it that the guy who was being questioned about Obama’s missing passport files at the State Department was found dead the next week? And how is it that the only week that is illegible from the travel files of people incoming to the USA happens to be the week that Obama was born?

Coincidences? Maybe if you accept a probability of a million to one that both would happen to Obama.

Let me restate that bad people do bad things invisible to us and that most Americans do not want to accept that some of their leaders are bad people. Americans want to think the best about people … especially minorities.

Now, take the next step with me. If the Obama people would threaten to harm Chelsea Clinton, then what would keep them from threatening to harm the children of Chief Justice John Roberts or the grandchildren of Justice Anthony Kennedy to get a favorable answer to Obamacare? Or to threaten the family members of Justice Carter to keep him from investigating the passports and college documents of Obama?

What would you do if some credible thug threatened harm to your children, spouse, parents, or grandchildren? That is a common tactic of Muslim terrorists in the Middle East to gain compliance. Threats are certainly common tactics of Chicago gangsters and politicians.

Why did Joe Sestack and those pro-life Democrats change their minds about supporting Obamacare when abortion funding was still left in Obamacare?

In my opinion, Obama is a bad person … he lies, he pits Americans against Americans with class warfare, race warfare, and gender warfare like he did by encouraging the “occupy people” and lying about his discussions with Cardinal Dolan. And it is my opinion that he will do anything to maintain his power and to get his way … including stifling investigations about his citizenship, rigging elections, and fixing the outcome about the constitutionality of Obamacare.

Obama is a Saul Alinsky trained community organizer … he is addicting America to the drug of government benefits for his personal power … he is breaking the bank … he is destroying what made America great. To me, Barrack Hussein Obama and/or his organization like George Soros are bad … and will not hesitate to do bad things… including using threats … and coercion.

If coercion was used on Roberts or Kennedy or any justices, then how would we Americans know? Who could they tell without risking the lives of their loved ones?

Assuming the worst, how can we stop what is about to happen to healthcare in America and the growth to government because of coercion?

Michael Master is the author of “Rules for Conservatives” and “Save America Now!” which can be ordered at
www.saveamericanow.us.com

http://atlah.org What’s the Difference Between the Supreme Court, Tim Tebow, Joel Osteen, and Jeremiah Wright? Recorded on 9 April 2012.

Dr. James David Manning discusses the Supreme Court and Obamacare issue. Recorded 28 March 2012.

“ATLAH: THAT’S WHAT GOD SAID.”
Anointed to establish families, churches and businesses, unlike any the world hath seen. Indeed the final product of the land, ATLAH, will boast of being the seat of the world’s banking, business, and education centers.

Love us or hate us?
Please Support Us

Barack Hussein (The Long Legged Mack Daddy) Obama is a blood bred Muslim. If you want no more 9/11, give Obama the Presidency. America has a hostage negotiated peace with Islam. Neither the Congress nor the Supreme Court can impeach Obama. He is the abomination of desolation. Daniel and Jesus confirmed. Recorded on 14 February 2012.

http://www.atlah.org

New York/ATLAH Court Appeals Judge Malihi’s Decision. Recorded on 7 February 2012.

Dr. James David Manning speaks about the decision by Georgia Judge Malihi to keep Barack Hussein (The Long Legged Mack Daddy) Obama on the Georgia Ballot. Recorded on 4 February 2012.

Dr. James David Manning interviews Carl Swensson on the victory in Atlanta Court. Recorded on 26 January 2012.

Dr. James David Manning interviews Carl Swensson on Obama being ordered to court. Recorded on 25 January 2012.